| |
STARSTREAM REPORT / SSR-2005-08-25-CIA-STARGATERV911 /
EDIT "R" (RELEASE TO PUBLIC)
NOTE: We assume for this particular exercise that
remote viewing of distant targets, as practiced by the CIA and military
intelligence agencies, is a real and viable method of intelligence collection.
Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 7:10 PM
DRAFT COPY PRELIMINARY RESULTS
ORIGINAL CIA DOCUMENTS:
CIA-RDP96-00788ROO1900470003-9
CIA-RDP96-00788ROO1200070002-1
Following 9/11, an internal CIA report concluded that there had been "No
examination of the potential for terrorists to use aircraft as weapons, as
distinguished from traditional hijackings."
Introduction
There are two copies of the same document found in the CIA STAR GATE Collection.
This collection consists of recently released declassified material covering
more than twenty years of government sponsored anomalous mental phenomena (AMP)
used for information collection (RV - Remote Viewing) and material perturbation
(RP - Remote Perturbation). The document appears to be from 1983, as there is a
notation that the target subject (pilot) is "not in the country as of 12 Dec
83."
This document is of interest primary for two reasons:
The prediction of an EVENT:
An "aircraft", will "...fly to Washington, D.C. with the mission of crashing
into the US Capitol building..."
The possible identification of the PILOT:
The pilot, "...not in the country as of 12 Dec 83, foreign, perhaps Iranian,
speaks English and perhaps French...name may be or sound like Jerry, Gerard, or
Geraldo..."
The remaining information, as presented in this document, appears at first
glance to be seriously wrong. Interesting correlations appear upon closer
examination.
The art of remote viewing is far from being an exact
science. There is a signal to noise ratio involved, and errors are to be
expected. There is the extraordinary distance in spacetime from 1983 to 2001.
More importantly for this report, the original data presented by the "four
different sources" is not available. What appears in the document is an informal
analytical summary and interpretation of the raw data provided by the viewers.
The methodology used by the viewers is not known. It is noted within the
document that "this information was produced unofficially and is unconfirmed."
The Account by Paul Smith
The account by Paul Smith, telling of his involvement in special INSCOM/Monroe
Institute RAPT sessions held during late 1983, fits the apparent time frame of
the creation of the document.
Smith writes that he was among the second group of INSCOM people to "get RAPT'ed"
sometime around Dec. 2, 1983. [1]
About the Thursday Dec. 8th, 1983 Future 15 sessions Smith writes:
"...we were to try to perceive events occurring over the next two years."
INSCOM RAPT Gateway Experience Precognition Session, ~ Dec 9th, 1983
Page 150-151 of Paul Smith's book, "Reading the Enemy's Mind," tells the story
of a special future oriented remote viewing group session at the Monroe
Institute.
Smith mentions being tasked against a specific target:
"Will there be a terrorist attack against government facilities in the
Washington, D.C. area in next few months?"
"Where will the next terrorist attack take place?"
"When will the next attack take place?"
Papers with the impressions were handed in, and according to Smith, "...we never
heard about it to my recollection."
Interpretation
In this extended preliminary report, STARSTREAM has dissected the original
document using "conceptual remote viewing" methodology. This allows for
reexamination of the data as presented in the original document. Key basic
concepts can be mapped to a presumed target event: the failed attack against
Washington, D.C. during the terrorist events of 9-11-2001. In this context,
United Flight 93 appears to be the primary origin of the 1983 report. It is
generally accepted that the hijackers aboard Flight 93 intended to fly the plane
into the U.S. Capitol Building. The terrorist piloting Flight 93 was Ziad Jarrah
(Jarrah is also sometimes spelled Jarrahi). Jarrah is a name that might be
considered to "sound like Jerry, Gerard, or Geraldo." We note that none of the
names of other terrorists involved in the attack against Washington, D.C. bear
any resemblance to Jerry, Gerard, or Geraldo.
Jarrah, a foreigner from Lebanon, was not Iranian but was of middle eastern
origin. Jarrah spoke both English and French.
Examining the Data
We begin with the assumption that remote viewed data represents a very noisy
signal, buried in a set of non-local interactions separated from each other in
ordinary spacetime by the limit of the speed of light. The basic black box with
an input and an output forms the basis of our model. Since there are no accepted
theories of a non-local signal (that is a signal that propagates faster than
light, and is therefore outside of causality) we restrict the actual
phenomenology to a black box, which accepts an input and produces an output. The
internal workings of the black box are not important for our purposes.
For the black box the choice of any input signal will affect the output signal.
The primary problem we wish to avoid for our black box is CONCEPTUAL OVERLAY.
Conceptual overlay results from the improper choice of an input signal into the
black box. An input signal which results in an output that is strongly
over-correlated to the input signal is considered to have been colored by
conceptual overlay. The resulting output signal is generally localized and
produces little or no information about the distant non-local target. Ideally we
wish to maximize the output signal for non-local information, which can later be
correlated to actual events.
Our method relies on mapping and selection rather than pre-biased
interpretations of the raw signal output of the black box. It is expected that
the output is a noisy mixture of local and non-local signals. To optimize the
correlations we focus on the primitive content rather than on the original
analysis and conceptual overlay for our interpretation.
Note that the primary distinguishing characteristic of this method is that we do
not directly ask questions of the black box. Instead we allow the non-local
signal to query our local reality. We observe any conceptual correlations to
actual events.
Interpretive mapping of the output data
Given an existing set of data from a black box output measurement, we proceed by
reducing the data to primitive conceptual elements. Ideas are the primary
resource in this method, other sensory impressions are generally not discussed.
Applying CON-RV to the CIA STAR GATE documents
CIA-RDP96-00788ROO1900470003-9
CIA-RDP96-00788ROO1200070002-1
The session(s) which produced the data in this document appears to have been
heavily front loaded with information. This is made more explicit given the
likelihood that the RAPT sessions described by Paul Smith are the source of the
information.
We assume that the following keys were inserted into the input of the black box:
"terrorist attack"
"government facilities"
"Washington, D.C. area"
"will, when, where" and "next few months"
Given the above, we strongly expect that these items will appear in some form in
the output of the black box.
We also expect some kind of mixture of the above local elements with a non-local
source, given that altered states of consciousness were likely induced by the
methodology at the Monroe Institute. This should result in a mixed output of
noise, and local and non-local signal.
OUR ANALYSIS OF THE DOCUMENT USING CON-RV METHODOLOGY
APPARENT SOURCE
"SOURCES: The sources for this information are Army personnel who have provided
accurate information in the past. This information was produced unofficially and
is unconfirmed. Four different sources provided information which contained the
same basic elements. The following information are those elements which were
generally repeated."
We conclude that the origin of the data is likely from INSCOM sessions held at
the Monroe Institute in early December, 1983, based upon the account by Paul
Smith, and the fact that the document states that the sources were Army
personnel, that they provided accurate information in the past, and that the
information was produced unofficially and is unconfirmed.
The methodology was likely unconventional as explained by Paul Smith in his
book.
DESCRIPTION OF THE EVENT
"EVENT: Sources state that a small "Lear Jet type aircraft" loaded with
explosives (not further identified) will depart from a northern mid-west area,
perhaps Chicago or near Chicago, and fly to Washington, D C with the mission of
crashing into the US Capitol building. One source states that he feels there is
a flight plan on file at National Airport."
The description of the event is heavily front loaded, as noted previously.
The target "Washington, D.C." was likely front loaded as an input to the black
box, as was "terrorist" and "attack", etc.
Here are the primitive elements:
Small aircraft, Learjet, jet-type, aircraft, loaded, explosives, depart,
northern,Midwest, Chicago, mission, crashing, U.S. Capitol Building, flight
plan, National Airport
Mapping to the 9/11 events:
"small"
The 9/11 pilots flew test flights using small aircraft, including a fly over of
the Washington, D.C. area. According to the 911 report Karl Rove first informed
President Bush that a small, twin-engine plane had crashed into the World Trade
Center. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice told Bush that it was a
twin-engine aircraft, and a commercial aircraft.
"Learjet"
NO direct match. We first concluded that this was analytical overlay, perhaps
from the original identification as told to President Bush, of a small
twin-engine commercial jet plane crashing into the World Trade Center. Later we
discovered that a nearly identical description appears in the 9/11 Commission
Report, pages 457-458:
"A 1998 White House tabletop exercise chaired by Richard Clarke included a
scenario in which a terrorist group loaded a Learjet with explosives and took
off for a suicide mission to Washington. Military officials said they could
scramble fighter jets from Langley Air Force Base to chase the aircraft, but
they would need "executive" orders to shoot it down."
We wonder if this exercise was influenced or inspired by the 1983 CIA document.
This also demonstrates that there is always the danger of picking up related but
"off target" information during any remote viewing session.
"jet-type"
All 9/11 planes were 757 or 767 commercial jet aircraft
"aircraft"
The 9/11 plot involved the use of aircraft as weapons of mass destruction
"loaded"
The 9/11 pilots were concerned that the planes be loaded with the maximum amount
of jet fuel
"explosives"
The jet fuel loaded into the planes was the explosive which turned the planes
into WMD; the terrorists threatened to use an explosive bomb on Flight 93
"depart"
The 9/11 aircraft involved in the Washington, D.C. area attacks departed from
Newark, New Jersey, and Washington, D.C.
"northern"
The region of concern was NORAD's northeastern watch; generally "northern" is a
partial hit, as opposed to say "southern", etc.
"Midwest"
The Midwest is mentioned in connection with Chicago and the Great Lakes area.
Front loading by the question "where is the plane NOW" likely skewed this
result. Further details, in particular the history of the aircraft, are required
to check this out.
"Chicago"
Again there are indications that Chicago may have some relationship to the
aircraft in the period near to 1983.
NOTE ADDED 10-20-2005:
9/11 and Chicago
One of the items that bothered me about the CIA document that likely resulted
from the 1983 Monroe Institute INSCOM future remote viewing sessions, was the
reference to Chicago.
Today I discovered a reference connecting Chicago with crashing into a building,
from the official 9/11 report:
"At 9:00, Lee Hanson received a second call from his son Peter:
It's getting bad, Dad-A stewardess was stabbed-They seem to have knives and
Mace-They said they have a bomb-It's getting very bad on the plane-Passengers
are throwing up and getting sick-The plane is making jerky movements-I don't
think the pilot is flying the plane-I think we are going down-I think they
intend to go to Chicago or someplace and fly into a building-Don't worry, Dad-
If it happens, it'll be very fast-My God, my God.
The call ended abruptly. Lee Hanson had heard a woman scream just before it cut
off. He turned on a television, and in her home so did Louise Sweeney. Both then
saw the second aircraft hit the World Trade Center.
At 9:03:11, United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower of the World Trade
Center.51 All on board, along with an unknown number of people in the tower,
were killed instantly."
posted by Starstream Research @ 9:40 PM
[continued]
"mission"
The 9/11 mission was to inflict as much damage as possible using aircraft as WMD.
Specifically in the Washington, D.C. area the targets were the Pentagon, the
Capitol Building, and the White House. The White House was considered to be a
more difficult target.
"crashing"
Although all of the 911 aircraft crashed, Flight 93 failed to reach the intended
target in Washington, D.C. and crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.
"U.S. Capitol Building"
The U.S. Capitol building is the assumed intended target of Flight 93
"flight plan"
A general point, that the planes had properly registered flight plans, and were
not rogue invaders
"National Airport"
Although this is likely overlay due to front loading, it should be noted that
National Airport is in the Washington, D.C area. Identification of National
Airport was provided by only one of the four sources.
TIMELINE
"DATE OF EVENT: The month of December, January or February. The most probable
day is the 6, 16 or 26th of each month."
Mapping to 9/11 Events:
Note: The timeline was likely seriously skewed by front loading, given the
account of Paul Smith. Several interesting correlations can be made, however.
[Comment added 8-25-2007: Inversion of images is commonly reported by remote
viewers. It is possible that a 6 can be viewed as a 9, and vice versa. The
original tasking instructions, given in Dec. of 1983, targeted the "next few
months" according to Paul Smith.]
"December, January, or February"
The holiday season of 2001 is discussed in detail in the 9/11 Report, as Jarrah,
Atta, and Shehhi all took foreign trips during this time period. This suggests
that the dates given in the CIA document may have been focused on the departure
and arrival of the terrorists.
"January" 2001
January 2001 was a pivotal month for many of the 9/11 pilots. January appears
118 times in the 9/11 Commission Report, February appears 79 times, and December
appears 100 times. For a quick comparison, March appears 94 times, April 79
times, June 410 times, July 431 times, August 168 times, and September, the
month of the actual attacks, 376 times. We therefore attach no significance to
the dates given by the remote viewers, apart from the above.
The identified dates may have some significance for Jarrah, in January of 2001,
perhaps related to his completion of Flight School and a trip to visit his
father at the end of January. We have found no other possible significance and
conclude that the dates given are not related to the 9/11 attack on Washington,
D.C.
6th: May have possible significance, not directly related to the date of the
attack
16th: May have possible significance, not directly related to the date of the
attack
26th: May have possible significance, not directly related to the date of the
attack
[Note added on 8-25-2007: We suggest that the three number sixes reported above
may have been nines. If that were true then the 9, 91, and 92 might be related
to the date of 9/11/2001.]
THE 9/11 AIRPLANES:
"AIRCRAFT: small "Lear Jet type" aircraft
blue and red in color, red predominating
Tail number may include the following characters:
A, N, Y, and the numbers 1 thru 7
most probably N, 2 and 7
Current location is believed to be along the Great
Lakes, perhaps Chicago.
Aircraft may have been purchased within the last 60
days in New Jersey or New York."
We suspect that there would have been confusion between the entire 9/11 event,
where four planes were used as weapons, and the front loading that specified the
Washington, D.C. area. There is a more serious problem with the time frame, as
the request for a current location in 1983 would conflict with the actual event
timeframe of September 2001. There are several errors resulting from temporal
front loading of the remote viewers.
Apart from dates and timelines, numbers and letters are generally considered to
be among the most difficult targets.
Here are the primitive elements:
Small, Lear Jet type, blue and red (red predominating), tail number, A, N, Y,
the numbers 1 through 7, N, 2, and 7, current location, Great Lakes, Chicago,
aircraft, purchased, last 60 days, New Jersey, New York
Mapping to 9/11 Events:
"small"
Original report of a plane crashing into the World Trade Center described the
aircraft as a small, twin-engine plane.
"Lear Jet type"
Likely analytical overlay, perhaps confusion given the report of a small
twin-engine commercial jet and the actual 767 and 757's used in the attack.
There is also this item mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report:
"A 1998 White House tabletop exercise chaired by Richard Clarke included a
scenario in which a terrorist group loaded a Learjet with explosives and took
off for a suicide mission to Washington. Military officials said they could
scramble fighter jets from Langley Air Force Base to chase the aircraft, but
they would need "executive" orders to shoot it down."
"blue and red"
Blue and red are the predominant colors used in the detailing of both the
American Airlines and the United Airlines planes.
"red predominating"
This also appears as analytical overlay, although red might be considered to
stand out more than the blue against the silver metallic plane bodies.
"Tail number," "A, N, Y and "the numbers 1 through 7," "N, 2, and 7"
Identification of the actual tail number would have been the target. It does
appear that there is a partial hit as the letter N is identified as one of the
three most likely letters. This is exactly correct for all four planes.
The actual tail numbers were:
N612UA
N334AA
N591UA
N644AA
Note that the 3 digital tail numbers all fall between 1 - 7 with the exception
of a single 9 in N591UA, the 757 flown by Jarrah. We assume that the inclusion
of the number 7 is related to the Boeing 757 or 767 designation.
We also note that the tail of the American Airlines planes features the
distinctive "double A" logo and bird graphic, which resembles the letter Y.
This appears to be a possible hit in most respects except for the number 9 in
N591UA.
"current location"
This is immediately problematic given that there is temporal overlay.
"Great Lakes"
No apparent mapping. Flight 93 turned back towards Washington, D.C shortly
before reaching the Great Lakes area.
"Chicago"
No apparent mapping.
NOTE ADDED 10-20-2005: 9/11 and Chicago
One of the items that bothered me about the CIA document that likely resulted
from the 1983 Monroe Institute INSCOM future remote viewing sessions, was the
reference to Chicago.
Today I discovered a reference connecting Chicago with crashing into a building,
from the official 9/11 report:
"At 9:00, Lee Hanson received a second call from his son Peter:
It's getting bad, Dad-A stewardess was stabbed-They seem to have knives and
Mace-They said they have a bomb-It's getting very bad on the plane-Passengers
are throwing up and getting sick-The plane is making jerky movements-I don't
think the pilot is flying the plane-I think we are going down-I think they
intend to go to Chicago or someplace and fly into a building-Don't worry, Dad-
If it happens, it'll be very fast-My God, my God.
The call ended abruptly. Lee Hanson had heard a woman scream just before it cut
off. He turned on a television, and in her home so did Louise Sweeney. Both then
saw the second aircraft hit the World Trade Center.
At 9:03:11, United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower of the World Trade
Center.51 All on board, along with an unknown number of people in the tower,
were killed instantly."
posted by Starstream Research @ 9:40 PM
[continued]
"aircraft"
The reference to the aircraft involved, as well as to the timeline, suggests
that the viewers were front loaded with questions such as "Where or when was the
aircraft purchased?" There is the suggestion that the viewers were being tasked
along a line of inquiry that skewed the data.
"purchased"
The terrorists involved in the 9/11 plot did not purchase any airplanes, however
they did purchase airplane tickets. The locations associated with the purchase
are New York and New Jersey.
"last 60 days"
Once again there is a serious problem with temporal front loading. Perhaps this
is related to the identification of the Chicago and Great Lakes region?
"New Jersey"
New Jersey plays a predominant role in the 9/11 events.
"New York"
New York plays a predominant role in the 9/11 events.
9/11 PILOTS
"PILOT: not in the country as of 12 Dec 83
foreign, perhaps Iranian
speaks English and perhaps French
May enter the country through Canada on a
French passport.
Name may be or sound like Jerry, Gerard or
Geraldo."
The identification of the pilot is the most interesting piece of information,
apart from identification of the plot to use airplanes as weapons against
government buildings in Washington, D.C. Generally it is our opinion that this
information is mostly correct. The most important data point is the
identification of the name of the pilot flying the mission against the U.S.
Capitol Building.
We note that of all of the names of the 9/11 pilots, the only potential match is
Ziad Jarrah. We also note with great interest that Jarrah is the pilot of Flight
93, and that the target was considered to be either the White House or the U.S.
Capitol Building in Washington, D.C.
Here are the primitive elements:
Pilot, country, 12 Dec 83, foreign, perhaps Iranian, speaks English, perhaps
(speaks) French, enter country, Canada, French, passport, name, Jerry, Gerard,
Geraldo
Mapping to 9/11 events:
"pilot"
Four planes were used in the 9/11 attacks. The names of the pilots were Mohammed
Atta (Flight 11), Hani Hanjour (Flight 77), Ziad Samir Jarrah (or
Jarrahi)(Flight 93) and Marwan al Shehhi (Flight 175). Of these four, only
Jarrah "sounds like" Jerry, Gerard or Geraldo. It should also be noted that none
of the names of the other hijackers "sounds like" Jerry, Gerard or Geraldo.
Jarrah piloted Flight 93, bound for Washington, D.C. The likely target was the
U.S. Capitol Building, as there had been some discussion that the White House
would be a difficult target.
"country"
This item is probably front loaded. It is likely that the viewers were asked "Is
the terrorist pilot in the United States?"
"12 DEC 83"
This appears to be the front loaded timeframe of the original sessions
"foreign"
Jarrah a citizen of Lebanon, also lived for a time in Germany
"perhaps Iranian"
This may be related to a quote by one of the passengers on Flight 93. In the
account by MSNBC at
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3067652/
"Jeremy Glick calls his wife, Lyz, in New York to say that three “Iranian
looking” men, one with a red box strapped to his waist, have taken control of
the plane and to call the authorities."
"speaks English"
Jarrah spoke excellent English
"perhaps (speaks)French"
Some reports state that Jarrah spoke fluent French as well as English
"passport"
The terrorists all entered the United States using passports, in other words no
one entered through illegal channels, although fraudulent information was used
in some cases
"name"
Jarrah was the pilot identified with Flight 93, on a mission to crash into the
United States Capitol Building. Jarrah may be interpreted to sound like Jerry
(as in Jarrahi) Gerard (Jah - rard) or Geraldo.
[1] "Reading the Enemy's Mind" by Paul Smith, page 143.
posted by Starstream Research @ 8:03 PM
For additional DIA-sourced 9/11 related warnings,
click here.
THIS REPORT IS THE PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF STARSTREAM
RESEARCH -- COPYRIGHT (c) 2009 -- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IN FULL.
|
|
|
|
